'Law Enforcement Challenges\r'

'| Law Enforcement Ch totallyenges| [Type the document subtitle]| | Law Enforcement Challenges| | Cheryl TraceyProfessor Gregory BlancheCIS clxx Information Technology in lamentable Justice| 11/26/2012| | on that point are m each contests impartiality enforcement agencies manifestation when study internet exploitation, cyber stalking, and obscenity. Few challenges involve overlapping effort, lack of funding, overlapping jurisdictions, and priority.The persona of this paper is to explain in pointedness the greatest challenge law enforcement agencies investigating exploitation, cyber stalking, and obscenity, the specific challenges with overlapping of jurisdictions and solutions for overcoming these challenges, and to discuss if stirs should confine the ability to acidify with integrity some other when a cyber- abuse is carried out crosswise evidence lines. I sapidity equivalent the greatest challenge law enforcement agencies suit in investigating exploitation, cyb er stalking, and obscenity is issues with order and detection. â€Å"Data on the computer muckle be deleted, modified, or destroyed. (Taylor, Fritsch, Liederbach, Holt, 2012). It is very all-important(prenominal) for evidence to be collected, preserved, and examined right away. In most cases, 24 hours proves to be in any case late to recover non-tampered evidence. â€Å"Some computers postulate automatic wiping programs in case a new person touches the wrong mention on the keyboard. ” (http://www. supremecourt. gov. pk/ijc/Articles/10/2. pdf). Cyber forensics experts requires special tools which go out be able to access any data available on the great deal storage media including deleted files and data in unallocated book areas.Although time is of the essence, it is very important that law enforcement agencies follow the search and seizures laws. A imprimatur must be issued first ahead any evidence can be gathered, searched, or reviewed. A major challenge to law e nforcement agencies are overlapping jurisdictions. For example, â€Å"a cyber-stalker may reside in a different city or stock-still state than the victim, making it difficult for one agency to investigate. ”(Taylor, Fritsch, Liederbach, Holt, 2012).Obtaining assistance from out of state agencies can be limited cod to the circumstances. Cyber criminals are able to operate nationwide. This is wherefore law enforcement agencies reserve to work with local anaesthetic officials, foreign governments, and other agencies. Some agencies leave work with other agencies only if the crime is serious enough. To solve these problems, I would earn it to where each agency has a discussion section just for cybercrimes and each agency has jurisdiction to work with one another(prenominal). Jurisdiction laws would no longer exist for cybercrimes.I feel states should start the ability to work with one another when a cybercrime is carried out across state lines. Especially in cases where c yber bullying, child pornography, cyber stalking, or fraud is happening. I think everyone should work together to hand over and fight all types of crime. In conclusion, our local government require to implement laws and procedures to work together on every type of crime. I feel as though jurisdiction should have nothing to do with rather to stick with a crime or not.Cybercrimes should be a first priority and try and think of ways to have a monitoring system may accredited words typed on the internet throw out investigation needs to be done. adduce: Taylor, R. W. , Fritsch, E. J. , Liederbach, J. , & Holt, T. J. (2011). Ditigal crime and digital terrorism. (Second ed. , pp. 180-182). focal ratio Saddle River: Pearson Learing Solutions. http://www. supremecourt. gov. pk/ijc/Articles/10/2. pdf http://www. naavi. org/cl_editorial_04/edit_6_jan_04_01. htm\r\n'