The Greater Good of Society Verses Individualism

His ideas off the struggle aver and spirit severalize. He greatly believed in democracy and equation among homo. He believed in the three states of Democracy which are a state of equality, state of liberty, and a state of nature. Locke believed that one man comes by a power of another and in doing so creates a perfect society. Lockes belief of society differs from the philosopher Thomas Hobb, but agree with Mill. He believes that a man in his raw(a) state is constricted by laws, but could at long last do whatever he pleases.The state of nature is to ensure natural rubber so the nature of war is ot reached, so no man give step out of his state and threaten another mans state. Also if the natural rights of freedom are broken a state of war is reached. Locke glances an undivided to be more than important than society. Individuals steer the way of which society is going, and where they willing go. Because an individuals creates history, while humanity follows. For example M artine Luther King had one dream, this one mans view and opinion caused an outcry to America for change and change did come. If individuals state of nature or freedom there will be a state of war among man.In conclusion every(prenominal) three philosophers all had similar ideas. They all believed that an individual is greater than society. But is that necessarily correct. One man is more important than humanity, and humanity is beneath an individual. Mills concept of happiness more or less ruining the good of public. While Locke viewed mans safety of their natural state an substantial rule of mankind, which prevents the nature of war. The last philosopher Hobbs had an idea that in order for mankind to function, the individual most do two thing. One could together to trope a common bound, and two, be completely happy. But who is more important, you or mankind?